Carl Emil Overbeck vs Saba George Nanobashvili Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
C. Emil Overbeck vs S. George Nanobashvili

Carl Emil Overbeck

DEN

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

525

C. Rank

523

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Saba George Nanobashvili

SWE

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

525

C. Rank

523

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Overbeck 1 - 0 Nanobashvili

They have played 2 sets in total, with Carl Emil Overbeck winning 2 and Saba George Nanobashvili winning 0. The last match between Carl Emil Overbeck and Saba George Nanobashvili was at the M25 Falun, 24-09-2025, Round: R2, Surface: I.hard, with Carl Emil Overbeck getting the victory 6-3 6-3.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Overbeck	1
Nanobashvili	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R2) M25 Falun(09-24-25)

Stats

Carl Emil Overbeck

Saba George Nanobashvili

C. E. Overbeck vs S. G. Nanobashvili H2H Profile

C. E. Overbeck	Stats	S. G. Nanobashvili
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
65.48% (55-29)	Career Total W/L	47.37% (36-40)
1	Indoor	0
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

C. E. Overbeck vs S. G. Nanobashvili Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Carl Emil Overbeck has won 41.26% of points on their second serve, while Saba George Nanobashvili has won 37.90%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Carl Emil Overbeck, in recent form, has won 44.69% of their opponent's second serve points, while Saba George Nanobashvili has won 49.07%. The same stats for first serve returns are 26.67% and 30.80% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Carl Emil Overbeck has saved 52.74% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Saba George Nanobashvili has saved 48.81% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Carl Emil Overbeck has won 68.09% of matches played (W/L 32/15), with Saba George Nanobashvili winning 44.44% (W/L 12/15) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Carl Emil Overbeck has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 74% (W/L 23/8), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 29/19). Saba George Nanobashvili has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 74% (W/L 19/15), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 35% (W/L 11/20).
Player level: In the last year, Carl Emil Overbeck has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 65.63% of matches (W/L 21/11), where as Saba George Nanobashvili has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 44.44% of matches (W/L 12/15). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Carl Emil Overbeck winning 1 times and Saba George Nanobashvili being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Carl Emil Overbeck winning 2 and Saba George Nanobashvili winning 0.
The last match between Carl Emil Overbeck and Saba George Nanobashvili was at the M25 Falun, 24-09-2025, Round: R2, Surface: I.hard, with Carl Emil Overbeck getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:19:36.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Carl Emil Overbeck has played against opponents with an average rank of 388.4 while Saba George Nanobashvili has played against players with an average rank of 41.74.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Carl Emil Overbeck has won 67% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Saba George Nanobashvili has won 67% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Carl Emil Overbeck has converted 36.71% of breakpoint opportunities, and Saba George Nanobashvili has converted 36.73% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Carl Emil Overbeck vs Saba George Nanobashvili Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

C. E. Overbeck vs S. G. Nanobashvili H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

C. E. Overbeck	Stats	S. G. Nanobashvili
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
12	Games Won	6
6	Aces (Total)	5
2	Total Double Faults	7
1:19:36	Average Match Time	1:19:36
59% (36/61)	1st Serve %	52% (34/66)
75% (27/36)	1st Serve Win %	71% (24/34)
60% (15/25)	2nd Serve Win %	34% (11/32)
67% (4/6)	Break Pts Won %	20% (1/5)
47% (31/66)	Return Points Win %	31% (19/61)
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

C. E. Overbeck Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Playford Challenger - 24-11-2025
QF Alex BoltA. Bolt	L	7-6(5) 6-4	Stats
R2 Jason Murray KublerJ. Murray	W	6-3 3-1 ret.	Stats
R1 Matthew DellavedovaM. Dellavedova	W	3-6 7-5 6-2	Stats
Q3 Masamichi ImamuraM. Imamura	W	6-4 5-7 6-1	Stats
Q1 Naoki TajimaN. Tajima	W	6-2 6-2	Stats

View All

S. G. Nanobashvili Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
M25 Hradec Kralove - 24-11-2025
R1 Richard AntoniR. Antoni	L	6-4 6-2	Stats
Q3 Richard AntoniR. Antoni	W	6-2 6-3	Stats
Q1 Simon SmejkalS. Smejkal	W	6-4 6-1	Stats
M25 Monastir - 13-10-2025
Q2 Jay Johnson-HauldrenJ. Johnson-Hauldren	L	6-2 6-0	Stats
Q1 Gabriele Maria PianoG. Maria	W	6-7(8) 6-1 10-1	Stats

View All

C. E. Overbeck vs S. G. Nanobashvili Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

C. E. Overbeck	Stats	S. G. Nanobashvili
65.48% (55/29)	YTD Win/Loss	47.37% (36/40)
62.03% (116/71)	Sets Win/Loss	47.06% (80/90)
55.25% (969/785)	Games Win/Loss	48.94% (805/840)
74.19% (23/8)	Hard Win/Loss	55.88% (19/15)
60.42% (29/19)	Clay Win/Loss	35.48% (11/20)
60.00% (3/2)	Indoor Hard W/L	54.55% (6/5)
0.35	Aces Per Game	0.11
295	Aces Total	90
0.23	Double Faults Per Game	0.25
199	Total Double Faults	202
1:14:25	Average Match Time	1st Match
332.38	Average Opponent Rank	120.59
64% (2722/4270)	1st Serve %	59% (1651/2815)
69% (1882/2722)	1st Serve Win %	62% (1018/1651)
48% (737/1548)	2nd Serve Win %	41% (483/1164)
44% (207/473)	Break Points Won % (Total)	49% (134/273)
42% (1813/4312)	Return Points Win %	43% (1114/2616)
64.71% (11/6)	Challenger W/L	0% (0/0)
65.67% (44/23)	Futures W/L	47.37% (36/40)
65% (55/84)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	48% (36/75)
40% (6/15)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	47% (7/15)
68% (13/19)	Deciding Set Win %	58% (11/19)
96% (48/46)	1st Set Won, Won Match	81% (37/30)
4% (48/2)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	19% (37/7)
25% (36/9)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	15% (39/6)